SOUDERS v. NORTHERN STAR LENDING LLC et al
| MICHELE SOUDERS |
| NORTHERN STAR LENDING LLC, CRYSTAL CHAPMAN-CHEVALIER, WOLF RIVER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-20 |
| 1:2023cv01834 |
| October 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to CRYSTAL CHAPMAN-CHEVALIER, NORTHERN STAR LENDING LLC, WOLF RIVER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. (KAA) |
| Filing 7 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (KAA) |
| Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA) |
| Filing 5 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James Patrick Hanlon. (KAA) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew J. Goldstein on behalf of Plaintiff MICHELE SOUDERS. (Goldstein, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather A. Kolbus on behalf of Plaintiff MICHELE SOUDERS. (Kolbus, Heather) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel A. Edelman on behalf of Plaintiff MICHELE SOUDERS. (Edelman, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by MICHELE SOUDERS. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7850902) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-G, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Edelman, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
