HENDRY v. WAL-MART, INC.
Plaintiff: PAMELA HENDRY
Defendant: WAL-MART, INC.
Case Number: 1:2023cv01873
Filed: October 18, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Referring Judge: Crystal S Wildeman
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2023 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses, filed by WAL-MART, INC..(Pfleging, Lesley)
October 26, 2023 Filing 10 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by PAMELA HENDRY. (Anker, Carlton)
October 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference set for 1/3/2024 10:30 AM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Crystal S. Wildeman. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Crystal S. Wildeman on 10/19/2023.(SWM)
October 19, 2023 Filing 8 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LBT)
October 19, 2023 Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LBT)
October 18, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant WAL-MART, INC.. (Pfleging, Lesley)
October 18, 2023 Filing 5 DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Defendant WAL-MART, INC.. (Pfleging, Lesley)
October 18, 2023 Filing 4 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by WAL-MART, INC.. (Pfleging, Lesley)
October 18, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Madeline Leigh Richmond on behalf of Defendant WAL-MART, INC.. (Richmond, Madeline)
October 18, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Lesley A. Pfleging on behalf of Defendant WAL-MART, INC.. (Pfleging, Lesley)
October 18, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Boone County Circuit Court, case number 06C01-2309-CT-001235, filed by WAL-MART, INC.. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7860206) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 State Court Record (: Complaint for Damages, Appearance of Carlton W. Aker for Plaintiff, Summons to Defendant Wal-Mart, Inc., Certificate of Service, Return of Service, Appearance of Lesley A. Pfleging for Defendant, Defendants Jury Demand, Defendants Motion for Enlargement of Time, an Order Granting Defendants Motion for Enlargement of Time, and Appearance of Madeline L. Richmond for Defendant. ))(Pfleging, Lesley)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HENDRY v. WAL-MART, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PAMELA HENDRY
Represented By: Carlton Wayne Anker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WAL-MART, INC.
Represented By: Madeline Leigh Richmond
Represented By: Lesley A. Pfleging
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?