MILLS v. US MARSHALLS
| ROBERT MILLS |
| US MARSHALLS |
| 1:2023cv01947 |
| October 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Crystal S Wildeman |
| Richard L Young |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 FINAL JUDGMENT - In the Entry issued this date, the court screened Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and dismissed it for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, the court now enters final judgment against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants. Signed by District Judge Richard L. Young on 12/18/2023. Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. (JSR) |
Filing 8
ENTRY SCREENING AND DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT - The court DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Filing No. #6 ) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Filing No. #7 ) is DENIED as moot. Final judgment shall follow by separate order. (See Entry.) Signed by District Judge Richard L. Young on 12/18/2023. Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. (JSR)
|
| Filing 7 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ROBERT MILLS. (LF) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against US MARSHALLS, filed by ROBERT MILLS.(LF) |
|
Filing 5
ENTRY GRANTING IFP STATUS AND SCREENING COMPLAINT - Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Filing No. #2 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint (Filing No. #1 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to amend his complaint. If Plaintiff chooses to file an amended complaint, he should be sure to provide enough details to tell a story of his interaction with the U.S. Marshals (including what they did, when, and where) and provide a current address. Plaintiff shall have through December 12, 2023, to file an amended complaint, or the case will be dismissed with prejudice without further warning. SEE ORDER. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by District Judge Richard L Young on 11/21/2023. (AAS)
|
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ROBERT MILLS. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against US MARSHALLS, filed by ROBERT MILLS. (No fee paid with this filing) (DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: MILLS v. US MARSHALLS | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ROBERT MILLS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: US MARSHALLS | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
