RICE v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I
PATRICK RICE |
KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I |
1:2023cv02042 |
November 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Mario Garcia |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 PARTIES' PROPOSED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Defendant KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I . (Kite, Donald) |
Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference set for 1/29/2024 at 9:30 AM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 11/27/2023.(LBT) |
Filing 8 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LBT) |
Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LBT) |
Filing 6 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by PATRICK RICE. (Grace, Mandy) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Rudy Longman on behalf of Plaintiff PATRICK RICE. (Longman, Rudy) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Mandy Jane Grace on behalf of Plaintiff PATRICK RICE. (Grace, Mandy) |
Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I identifying Other Affiliate THE KROGER CO., Other Affiliate KRGP LLC for KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I.. (Kite, Donald) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Donald B. Kite, Sr on behalf of Defendant KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I. (Kite, Donald) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Madison Circuit Court, case number 48C03-2310-CT-000202, filed by KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7898362) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Record Chronological Case Summary, Complaint for Damages and Jury Demand, Appearance of Mandy Grace, Appearance of Rudy Longman, Summons, Summons, Summons, Cert. of Issuance of Summons, Certificate of Issuance of Summons, Certificate of Issuance of Summons, Appearance of Donald B Kite Sr., Defendant Kroger Limited Partnership I's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint for Damages and Jury Demand, Unopposed Motion to Amend Caption by Interlineation, Order Amending Caption by Interlineation, #3 State Court Record Operative Complaint)(Kite, Donald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: RICE v. KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: PATRICK RICE | |
Represented By: | Mandy Jane Grace |
Represented By: | Rudy Longman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I | |
Represented By: | Donald B. Kite, Sr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.