COEUR v. ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT UNIVERSAL
| FRANCOIS JACQUES COEUR |
| ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT UNIVERSAL |
| 1:2023cv02073 |
| November 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court has ordered that this action be dismissed with prejudice. The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 1/4/2024. Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. (JSR)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER - Mr. Coeur's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED #6 . While in forma pauperis status allows Mr. Coeur to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, he remains liable for the full fees. Mr. Coeur's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Final judgment will issue by separate entry. (See Order.) Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 1/4/2024. Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. (JSR)
|
| Filing 7 Submission of Notice and Minute Entry, filed by Plaintiff FRANCOIS JACQUES COEUR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JSR) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff FRANCOIS JACQUES COEUR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
| Filing 5 Submission, filed by Plaintiff FRANCOIS JACQUES COEUR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - Mr. Coeur SHALL either pay the $402 filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis by December 22, 2023. The Clerk shall include a form motion to proceed in forma pauperis with this Order. Mr. Coeur shall have through December 22, 2023, to file an amended complaint addressing the deficiencies discussed. The Clerk shall include the non-prisoner Complaint form with this Order. Mr. Coeur SHALL submit his amended complaint on this form. If no amended complaint is filed, this action will be dismissed for the reasons set forth and final judgment entered without further notice. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 11/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 Moton to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Form, #2 Complaint Form)(JRB)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT UNIVERSAL, filed by FRANCOIS JACQUES COEUR. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: COEUR v. ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT UNIVERSAL | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: FRANCOIS JACQUES COEUR | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT UNIVERSAL | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
