BROWN v. GALE et al
| CORY DAVID BROWN |
| GALE, MAVES, COREY VALDEZ, CREANER, WHITE, BRAHMAN, ALLEN and CENTURION |
| 1:2023cv02131 |
| November 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER - Cory Brown's motion requesting a complete copy of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, dkt. #12 , is denied because the Court does not furnish such research materials for litigants. Mr. Brown's motion requesting a jury trial, dkt. #13 , is granted insofar the Court treats his motion as a properly filed jury trial demand. Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 1/25/2024. (KAA)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER - Cory Brown will have through February 16, 2024, to pay the $402.00 filing fee or renew his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by filing a statement of his inmate trust account transactions for the six months preceding the filing of his complaint. Mr. Brown's motions regarding discovery, dkts. #9 , #10 , and #11 , are denied as premature. Mr. Brown's motion requesting a complete copy of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, dkt. #13 , is denied because the Court does not furnish such research materials for litigants. SEE ORDER. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 1/17/2024. (JRB)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Rule 38 Jury Trial, filed by Plaintiff CORY DAVID BROWN. (JSR) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Discovery, filed by Plaintiff CORY DAVID BROWN. (DWH) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Interrogatories for Scope of Discovery, filed by Plaintiff CORY DAVID BROWN. (DWH) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Copy of Federal Rules, filed by Plaintiff CORY DAVID BROWN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JRB) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Depositions, filed by Plaintiff CORY DAVID BROWN. (KAA) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT, filed by CORY DAVID BROWN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JSR) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge, filed by CORY DAVID BROWN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(SWM) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER - #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as presented. Mr. Brown must resubmit his motion with a statement of his inmate trust account transactions for the six months preceding the filing of his complaint. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2). The statement attached to Mr. Brown's motion is incomplete and is not certified by an appropriate official as required by the statute. Signed by District Judge Richard L Young on 12/14/2023 (Copy mailed to Plaintiff). (LBT)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff CORY DAVID BROWN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ALLEN, BRAHMAN, CENTURION, CREANER, GALE, MAVES, COREY VALDEZ, WHITE, filed by CORY DAVID BROWN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Envelope)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
