HAYS et al v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
| MICHAEL A. HAYS, L. P. and JANET EVANS |
| DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES, MARION COUNTY JUVENILE COURT and MEISHARA EVANS |
| 1:2023cv02171 |
| December 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| Richard L Young |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Attorneys-Only Conference, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL A. HAYS. (DJH) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Compel Conduct, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL A. HAYS. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 MOTION (Request) for Oral Hearing, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL A. HAYS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL A. HAYS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES, MEISHARA EVANS, MARION COUNTY JUVENILE COURT, filed by MICHAEL A. HAYS. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibits including court records and Intake Officer's Report)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
