STANFORD v. MICROSOFT INC. et al
JOSEPH STANFORD and SOFTWHO |
MICROSOFT INC., CISCO SYSTEMS INC., PFIZER INC. and BANK OF AMERICA INC. |
1:2023cv02179 |
December 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
James Patrick Hanlon |
James R Sweeney |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #9 Order of Recusal sent to JOSEPH STANFORD at 404 E. Washington St., Fort Wayne, IN 46802. Envelope marked return to sender, unable to forward. (LBT) |
Filing 15 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #6 Notice to Pro se Litigant sent to JOSEPH STANFORD at 404 E. Washington St., Fort Wayne, IN 46802. Envelope marked return to sender, unable to forward. (LBT) |
Filing 14 Mail Returned as RETURN TO SENDER; UNABLE TO FORWARD. #4 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction, #5 NOTICE to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement sent to JOSEPH STANFORD at 404 E Washington St., Ft. Wayne, IN. (JRB) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Change of Address for JOSEPH STANFORD. Address updated from 404 E. Washngton St., Fort Wayne, IN 46802 to 420 Division Avenue, Grand Forks, ND 58201. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JSR) |
Filing 12 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Court has ordered that this action be dismissed with prejudice. The Court now enters FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/13/2023. Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. (JSR) |
Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT - Mr. Stanford's complaint, dkt. #1 , is dismissed with prejudice. His motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #2 , is GRANTED. His motion for assistance with recruiting counsel is DENIED, dkt. #3 . Final judgment will issue by separate entry. (See Order.) Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/13/2023. Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. (JSR) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Judge James Patrick Hanlon. Judge Tanya Walton Pratt is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 1:23-cv-2179-JPH-TAB, on all future filings in this matter. (CCG) |
Filing 9 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Clerk is directed to randomly reassign case and notify parties of newly assigned Judge. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/8/2023 (Copy mailed to Plaintiff).(LBT) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Reassignment of Case to Judge Tanya Walton Pratt. Judge James R. Sweeney II is no longer assigned to this case. Please include the new case number, 1:23-cv-02179-TWP-TAB, on all future filings in this matter. (CCG) |
Filing 7 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Clerk is directed to randomly reassign case and notify parties of newly assigned Judge. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 12/7/2023. (SNB) |
Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff.) (LBT) |
Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 3 MOTION For Assistance With Recruiting Counsel, filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH STANFORD. (DJH) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH STANFORD. (DJH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BANK OF AMERICA INC., CISCO SYSTEMS INC., MICROSOFT INC., PFIZER INC., filed by JOSEPH STANFORD. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.