MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE et al v. WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS |
WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY |
1:2023cv02212 |
December 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mario Garcia |
James R Sweeney |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (CKM) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. (CKM) |
Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CKM) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CKM) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Donald D. Schwartz on behalf of Plaintiffs INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE. (Schwartz, Donald) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, filed by MATT RHOADES, TRUSTEE, INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-7936129) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Memorandum of Agreement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Schwartz, Donald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.