BROWNING v. O'MALLEY
| KRISTINA L. BROWNING |
| KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY |
| 1:2023cv02234 |
| December 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| M Kendra Klump |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 TRANSCRIPT of Administrative Record of Social Security Administration, by MARTIN O'MALLEY. (Attachments: #1 court transcript index, #2 administrative records 8.15.19, #3 payment records 8.15.19, #4 jurisdictional records 8.15.19, #5 non disability records 8.15.19, #6 disability records 8.15.19, #7 medical records 8.15.19, #8 administrative records 8.10.21, #9 payment records 8.10.21, #10 jurisdictional records 8.10.21, #11 non disability records 8.10.21, #12 disability records 8.10.21, #13 medical records 8.10.21, #14 administrative records 1.16.24, #15 payment records 1.16.24, #16 jurisdictional records 1.16.24, #17 non disability records 1.16.24, #18 disability records 1.16.24, #19 medical records 1.16.24)(Wierenga, Julian) |
Filing 9
ORDER OF REFERENCE - The parties have indicated their consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge by the filing of a joint consent [Dkt. 8]. It is, therefore, ORDERED, that this case be referred to the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge, The Honorable M. Kendra Klump, to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Should this case be reassigned to a magistrate judge other than the magistrate judge assigned the date of this order, any attorney or party of record may object within 30 days of such reassignment. If no objection is filed, the consent will remain in effect. The cause number of this action shall be amended to reflect the referral of this action to the Magistrate Judge. Please use altered case no. 1:23-cv-02234-MKK-SEB on all future filings with this court. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 1/22/2024. (DWH)
|
| Filing 8 JOINT CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by MARTIN O'MALLEY. (Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant KILOLO KIJAKAZI. (Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LBT) |
| Filing 5 Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. (LBT) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas Thomas Lavella on behalf of Plaintiff KRISTINA L. BROWNING. (Lavella, Nicholas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Frederick Richter on behalf of Plaintiff KRISTINA L. BROWNING. (Richter, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Adam Farr on behalf of Plaintiff KRISTINA L. BROWNING. (Farr, Eric) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against KILOLO KIJAKAZI, filed by KRISTINA L. BROWNING. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-7942301) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Farr, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
