ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
| FREDDIE ROBERTSON |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2023cv02271 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Castro Notice - This Order provides the petitioner with his notice of the treatment of his post-judgment filing and his opportunity to withdraw or amend the motion. He shall have through February 26, 2024, to: (1) file an amended motion which contains a complete statement of the claims and grounds on which he could and does challenge his conviction, and/or sentence; (2) withdraw such motion insofar as it could be thought to seek relief authorized by 28 U.S.C. 2255, or (3) notify the Court that the filing at Docket No. 1 does constitute a complete statement of the claims and grounds on which he could and does challenge his conviction and/or sentence. He is reminded that a 2255 motion, among other things, must be "signed under penalty of perjury by the movant or by a person authorized to sign it for the movant." Rule 2(b)(5) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts. If he does not take one of these steps by February 26, 2024, the motion will be treated as a 2255 motion and the case will proceed. The clerk shall include a form 2255 motion with the petitioner's copy of this Order. SEE ORDER. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 01/29/2024. (Attachments: #1 Form 2255 Motion)(AAS)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by FREDDIE ROBERTSON.(LF) |
|
Filing 1
ENTRY: The clerk shall therefore open a new civil action in the Indianapolis Division and re-docket the petition for writ of error coram nobis, dkt. 105 , as Robertson's motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. The Nature of Suit of the new civil action will be 510 and the Cause of Action will be 28:2255. A copy of this Order shall likewise be docketed in the newly opened action. Insofar as filed in the above action, the petition for a writ error coram nobis, dkt. 105, is denied without prejudice except to the extent that a new civil action will be opened. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/18/2023.(LF)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: FREDDIE ROBERTSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
