TRANBARGER v. ANDERSON POLICE DEPT.
| DALE C. TRANBARGER |
| ANDERSON POLICE DEPT. |
| 1:2023cv02293 |
| December 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER - The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to date and stamp the Summons attached hereto as Exhibit A and to mail it to Mr. Tranbarger (along with a copy of this Order) at the address below. Upon receipt, Mr. Tranbarger is ORDERED to properly serve Defendant with a copy of the dated and stamped Summons, along with a copy of his Complaint, Filing No. #1 , by March 20, 2024. Mr. Tranbarger is further ORDERED to file a Proof of Service by March 22, 2024 indicating that he properly served Defendant with a copy of the dated and stamped Summons and the Complaint. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/12/2024. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(AAS)
|
| Filing 10 Submission of Corrected Proposed Summons, filed by Plaintiff DALE C. TRANBARGER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(TPS) |
| Filing 9 ENTRY REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED SUMMONS - The Plaintiff has tendered to the Court a Summons not in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(a). Specifically, Plaintiff's proposed Summons does not include Defendant's name and address or Plaintiff's name and address. [Filing No. 1-2.] If Plaintiff wishes the Clerk to issue a Summons, Plaintiff must submit a Summons completed as required by Rule 4(a). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/26/2024. Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. (JSR) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by DALE C. TRANBARGER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(LF) |
| Filing 7 Letter from Plaintiff Dale Tranbarger. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (LF) |
| Filing 6 Letter from Plaintiff Brandy Tranbarger. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JRB) |
| Filing 5 RECEIPT #8312 for Partial Filing fee in the amount of $402.00, paid by DALE TRANBARGER. (CCG) |
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
| Filing 2 Statement of the Case by DALE C. TRANBARGER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CCG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ANDERSON POLICE DEPT., filed by DALE C. TRANBARGER. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Envelope)(CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TRANBARGER v. ANDERSON POLICE DEPT. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DALE C. TRANBARGER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ANDERSON POLICE DEPT. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
