MAIGA v. BOLTZ et al
Plaintiff: HAMZA MAIGA
Defendant: KYLE BOLTZ and MEADE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
Case Number: 1:2024cv00110
Filed: January 17, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: James R Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2024 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Jury Demand , filed by KYLE BOLTZ, MEADE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC..(Breitweiser-Hurst, Catherine)
January 31, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/18/2024 at 11:00 AM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. Parties shall participate in this conference by counsel. The information needed by counsel of record to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by separate notification. The parties shall file the proposed CMP no less than three business days prior to the pretrial conference. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 1/31/2024.(LBT)
January 18, 2024 Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (TPS)
January 18, 2024 Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (TPS)
January 18, 2024 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (TPS)
January 17, 2024 Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by MEADE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC. identifying Corporate Parent L&H COMPANY, INC. for MEADE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC... (Breitweiser-Hurst, Catherine)
January 17, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Catherine A. Breitweiser-Hurst on behalf of Defendants KYLE BOLTZ, MEADE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.. (Breitweiser-Hurst, Catherine)
January 17, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hendricks County Superior Court, case number 32D01-2312-CT-000231, filed by MEADE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., KYLE BOLTZ. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-7984597) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit Request for Stip to $75K and Response, #4 State Court Record Docket, Appearance, Complaint, Summons to Kyle Boltz, Summons to Meade, Appearance, Jury Demand, Motion for Extension of Time, Order Granting EOT)(Breitweiser-Hurst, Catherine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MAIGA v. BOLTZ et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HAMZA MAIGA
Represented By: Christopher L. Czernik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KYLE BOLTZ
Represented By: Catherine A. Breitweiser-Hurst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MEADE ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
Represented By: Catherine A. Breitweiser-Hurst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?