MCDONOUGH v. BRACKIN et al
| SHARON MC DONOUGH and SHARON MCDONOUGH |
| Elizabeth Brackin, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 1:2024cv00120 |
| January 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information. Consistent with Local Rule 5-3, Larry A Minnix hereby notifies the Clerk of the court of changed contact information. (Minnix, Larry) |
| Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JSR) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JSR) |
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (JSR) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to USA - ELIZABETH BRACKIN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. (JSR) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Larry A Minnix on behalf of Plaintiff SHARON MC DONOUGH. (Minnix, Larry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against All Defendants, filed by SHARON MC DONOUGH. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-7985955) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Minnix, Larry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
