Geva v. PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC.
| Leeor Geva |
| PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. |
| 1:2024cv00123 |
| January 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Crystal S Wildeman |
| Richard L Young |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER - The Court has been advised by counsel that a settlement has been reached in this action. Therefore, all pending motions, if any, are now DENIED AS MOOT and all previously ordered dates relating to discovery, filings, schedules, conferences and trial, if any, are VACATED. IT IS ORDERED that within thirty days of this date, counsel for the plaintiff shall file a motion to dismiss this cause or a stipulation of dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Crystal S. Wildeman on 3/6/2023.(SWM)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement , as to Plaintiff LEEOR GEVA, Defendant PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC., filed by LEEOR GEVA (Murphy, Robert) |
|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER:Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/11/2024 12:00 PM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Crystal S. Wildeman. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a ProposedCMP. See Order for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Crystal S. Wildeman on 2/28/2024.(SWM)
|
| Filing 9 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC.. (Roth, Brian) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC..(Roth, Brian) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian D. Roth on behalf of Defendant PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC.. (Roth, Brian) |
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service, filed by LEEOR GEVA. PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. served on 1/22/2024. (Murphy, Robert) |
| Filing 5 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by LEEOR GEVA. (Murphy, Robert) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (JRB) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. (JRB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages and Incidental Relief against PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC., filed by Leeor Geva. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-7986372) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Experian Excerpt, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Murphy, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Geva v. PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Leeor Geva | |
| Represented By: | Robert W Murphy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PHOENIX FINANCIAL SERVICES, LLC. | |
| Represented By: | Brian D. Roth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
