STILTS v. O'MALLEY
| SHANE D. STILTS |
| MARTIN O'MALLEY |
| 1:2024cv00137 |
| January 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| M Kendra Klump |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT of Administrative Record of Social Security Administration, by MARTIN O'MALLEY. (Attachments: #1 court transcript index, #2 administrative records, #3 payment records, #4 jurisdictional records, #5 non disability records, #6 disability records, #7 medical records part 1, #8 medical records part 2)(Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Taehee Hwang on behalf of Defendant MARTIN O'MALLEY. (Hwang, Taehee) |
Filing 7
ORDER OF REFERENCE - The parties have indicated their consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge in their Joint Consent, Dkt. #6 . It is, therefore, ORDERED that this case be referred to the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge, the Honorable M. Kendra Klump, to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. PLEASE USE ALTERED CASE NUMBER 1:24-cv-00137-MKK-MPB ON ALL FUTURE FILINGS WITH THIS COURT. (See Order.) Signed by District Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 2/22/2024. (JSR)
|
| Filing 6 JOINT CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by MARTIN O'MALLEY. (Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Julian Clifford Wierenga on behalf of Defendant MARTIN O'MALLEY. (Wierenga, Julian) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAS) |
| Filing 3 Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summons shall issue. (AAS) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kirsten Elaine Wold on behalf of Plaintiff SHANE D. STILTS. (Wold, Kirsten) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MARTIN O'MALLEY, filed by SHANE D. STILTS. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-7990184) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wold, Kirsten) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: STILTS v. O'MALLEY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: SHANE D. STILTS | |
| Represented By: | Kirsten Elaine Wold |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY | |
| Represented By: | Julian Clifford Wierenga |
| Represented By: | Taehee Hwang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
