WASHINGTON v. HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA, LLC D/B/A KIA FINANCE AMERICA et al
| BARELY DENISE WASHINGTON |
| HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA, LLC D/B/A KIA FINANCE AMERICA, NELNET, INC., TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC |
| 1:2024cv00188 |
| January 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mario Garcia |
| Richard L Young |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
ORDER granting #22 EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC'S EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT - IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the motion is granted and Equifax file its answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before April 24, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 03/27/2024. (AAT)
|
| Filing 22 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to April 24, 2024 in which to #1 Complaint , filed by Defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint)(Peluchette, Neil) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER granting Defendant Hyundai Capital America, Inc.'s #19 Motion for Extension of Time to File response to complaint to 4/19/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 3/22/2024. (SWM)
|
| Filing 20 SUBMISSION of Proposed Order re #19 MOTION for Extension of Time to April 19, 2024 in which to File a Responsive Pleading, filed by Defendant HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA, LLC D/B/A KIA FINANCE AMERICA. (Joseph, John) Modified on 3/22/2024 - Edited docket text to match document (NAD). |
| Filing 19 MOTION for Extension of Time to April 19, 2024 in which to #1 Complaint Answer Complaint, filed by Defendant HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA, LLC D/B/A KIA FINANCE AMERICA. (Joseph, John) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by NELNET, INC..(Paige, Pamela) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #16 - The Court, having considered this motion, finds that the motion is well taken and should be granted and will allow up to and including March 11, 2024, for Nelnet to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (See Order.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 3/7/2024. (BAA)
|
| Filing 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to March 11, 2024 to Answer Complaint, filed by Defendant NELNET, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint)(Paige, Pamela) |
|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER: Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference set for 4/29/2024 at 2:30 PM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 2/28/2024.(LBT)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time. Equifax shall file its answeror otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before March 25, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 2/27/2024. (LBT)
|
| Filing 13 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. (Peluchette, Neil) |
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to March 25, 2024 in which to #1 Complaint , filed by Defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Peluchette, Neil) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Neil Peluchette on behalf of Defendant EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC. (Peluchette, Neil) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal, filed by Plaintiff BARELY DENISE WASHINGTON. (Hemminger, David) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA, LLC D/B/A KIA FINANCE AMERICA. (Joseph, John) |
| Filing 8 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA, LLC D/B/A KIA FINANCE AMERICA identifying Corporate Parent KIA MOTORS CORPORATION, Corporate Parent Hyundai Motor America, Corporate Parent Hyundai Motor Company, Corporate Parent Kia America, Inc., Corporate Parent Kia Motors America, Inc., Corporate Parent Kia Corporation for HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA, LLC D/B/A KIA FINANCE AMERICA.. (Joseph, John) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by John E. Joseph on behalf of Defendant HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA, LLC D/B/A KIA FINANCE AMERICA. (Joseph, John) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Pamela A. Paige on behalf of Defendant NELNET, INC.. (Paige, Pamela) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
| Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (JRB) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA, LLC D/B/A KIA FINANCE AMERICA, NELNET, INC. and TRANS UNION, LLC. (JRB) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David W. Hemminger on behalf of Plaintiff BARELY DENISE WASHINGTON. (Hemminger, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by BARELY DENISE WASHINGTON. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-8001157) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Proposed Summons, #6 Proposed Summons)(Hemminger, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
