WERTZ v. SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.
| JAMES WERTZ |
| SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC. |
| 1:2024cv00189 |
| January 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 REPLY in Support of Motion re #16 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's "Rule 15(a)(1) Complaint" or, Alternatively, for Leave to File Amended Motion to Dismiss , filed by Defendant SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.. (Schiferl, Kevin) |
| Filing 22 DECLARATION of Plaintiff, filed by JAMES WERTZ. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit C - Copy of Siemens Document)(SWM) |
| Filing 21 RESPONSE in Opposition re #16 MOTION to Strike, filed by Plaintiff JAMES WERTZ. (KAA) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motion to Remand, filed by Defendant SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.. (McGowan, Stephanie) |
| Filing 19 Clarification of Initial Motion to Remand, filed by Plaintiff JAMES WERTZ. (AAS) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motion to Remand, filed by Defendant SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.. (McGowan, Stephanie) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend His Pleading Under Rule 15(a)(1), filed by Defendant SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.. (McGowan, Stephanie) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's "Rule 15(a)(1) Complaint" or, Alternatively, for Leave to File Amended Motion to Dismiss, filed by Defendant SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Rule 15(a)(1) Complaint)(McGowan, Stephanie) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for court to send email notices of court filings, filed by Plaintiff JAMES WERTZ. (AJG) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to file Motion to Remand, filed by Plaintiff JAMES WERTZ. (LF) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC., filed by JAMES WERTZ. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Various Documents)(SWM) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend Pleading, filed by Plaintiff JAMES WERTZ. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JSR) |
| Filing 11 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.. (Schiferl, Kevin) |
| Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Defendant SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kevin C. Schiferl)(Schiferl, Kevin) |
| Filing 9 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC. identifying Corporate Parent SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS BETEILIGUNGEN GMBH & CO. KG, Corporate Parent SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG for SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC... (Schiferl, Kevin) |
| Filing 8 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before District Judge Matthew P. Brookman. (AAS) |
| Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAS) |
| Filing 6 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (AAS) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF PENDING STATE COURT MOTIONS, filed by Defendant SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC. (Schiferl, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie V. McGowan on behalf of Defendant SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.. (McGowan, Stephanie) |
| Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC. identifying Corporate Parent SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS BETEILIGUNGEN GMBH & CO. KG, Corporate Parent SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG for SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC... (Schiferl, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin C. Schiferl on behalf of Defendant SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.. (Schiferl, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion County Superior Court 3, case number 49D03-2306-CT-025152, filed by SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.. (Filing fee $405, receipt number BINSDC-8001183) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Amended Complaint, #2 State Court Record State Court Docket, Appearance, Complaint, Summons, Service, Certified Mail Receipt, Appearance, Notice of Enlargement, 2nd Motion for Time, Order, 3rd Motion for Time, Motion to Dismiss, Brief ISO Motion to Dismiss, Order, Answer, Motion for Time, Motion in Opposition, Order, Motion for Time, Order, Amended Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schiferl, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: WERTZ v. SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JAMES WERTZ | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie V. McGowan |
| Represented By: | Kevin C. Schiferl |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
