MOORMAN v. HILL et al
| KIR MOORMAN |
| M HILL, FUMI and FADOTRIM |
| 1:2024cv00206 |
| January 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| M Kendra Klump |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Order on In Forma Pauperis Status #3 - The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #3 , is granted. Although the plaintiff is excused from pre-paying the full filing fee, he still must pay the three hundred and fifty dollar ($350.00) filing fee pursuant to the statutory formula set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) when able. The assessment of even an initial partial filing fee is waived because the plaintiff has no assets and no means by which to pay a partial filing fee. 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(4). Accordingly, no initial partial filing fee is due at this time. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 03/07/2024.(AAS)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (MEH) |
| Filing 8 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JSR) |
| Filing 7 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (JSR) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Indiana Northern; Case Number 3:24-cv-00087. Original file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: The Court TRANSFERS this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Martin on 1/30/2024. (mrm) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 1/31/2024.] Modified on 1/31/2024 - Updated dkt text (JSR).
|
| Filing 4 Docket sheet and file stamped copy of Complaint to be distributed to Kir Moorman #296121. (Attachments: #1 File stamped copy of Complaint)(kmt) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 1/31/2024.] |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Kir Moorman. (kmt) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 1/31/2024.] Modified on 1/31/2024 - reopened per CRD (JSR). |
| Filing 2 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Fadotrim, Fumi, M Hill, filed by Kir Moorman.(kmt) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 1/31/2024.] |
| Filing 1 Consent to Receipt of Documents Through Prisoner Electronic Filing Program by Kir Moorman. The Prisoner Electronic Filing Program operates pursuant to General Order 2018-1. When an inmate submits a document for electronic filing, the Prison Law Library emails a scanned copy and mails the original to the Court. The inmate should not mail a paper copy to the Court or a Defendant. When the scanned copy is docketed by the Court, a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is emailed to the Prison Law Library. This NEF is printed by the Prison Law Library and given to the inmate with only the first page of the inmate's filing. Defendants are served by the Court. When the Prison Law Library receives an NEF for an entry by the Court, the NEF and a full copy of any attached order or document is printed and given to the inmate. The Prison Law Library will not print the NEF for documents filed by a Defendant. The Defendant must serve the inmate by mail. (kmt) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 1/31/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
