STRONG v. ANGELS TO YOUR DOOR CORP et al
| RACHEAL STRONG |
| ANGELS TO YOUR DOOR CORP and KANISHA PINNER |
| 1:2024cv00231 |
| February 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Kellie M Barr |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is scheduled for an Initial Pretrial Conference by Zoom on 4/24/2024 at 10:00 AM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr. The Court will contact counsel by separate email with information to be used to participate in the conference. Read this entire order carefully--it sets out expectations for the conference as well as the undersigned's typical Practices & Procedures. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 3/18/2024.(KAA)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT - granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to File. The new deadline for Defendant to file a responsive pleading is hereby extended thirty (30) days to 4/5/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kellie M. Barr on 3/18/2024. (KAA) Modified on 3/19/2024 to correct signing judge's name (KAA).
|
| Filing 11 First MOTION for Extension of Time to April 5, 2024 to File a Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Defendants ANGELS TO YOUR DOOR CORP, KANISHA PINNER. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Ex. A - Affidavit of Kamiaha Pinner)(Boyd, Amber) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Amber K. Boyd on behalf of Defendants ANGELS TO YOUR DOOR CORP, KANISHA PINNER. (Boyd, Amber) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint & Summons served on Angels to Your Door Corp & Kanisha Pinner on February 12, 2024, filed by RACHEAL STRONG. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Weldy, Ronald) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to ANGELS TO YOUR DOOR CORP, KANISHA PINNER. (KAA) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - While in forma pauperis status allows Ms. Strong to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, she remains liable for the fees. Ross v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago, 748 F. App'x 64, 65 (7th Cir. Jan. 15, 2019) ("Under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), a district court may allow a litigant to proceed 'without prepayment of fees,'... but not without ever paying fees."). No payment is due at this time. Ms. Strong's counsel is responsible for serving process. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 2/5/2024. (SWM)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (AJG) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AJG) |
| Filing 4 ***PLEASE DISREGARD - SUMMONS WILL BE ADDRESSED AFTER MOTION FOR IFP IS RULED ON*** Summons Issued as to KANISHA PINNER. (AJG) Modified on 2/5/2024 (RSF). |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff RACHEAL STRONG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Weldy, Ronald) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald E. Weldy on behalf of Plaintiff RACHEAL STRONG. (Weldy, Ronald) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against All Defendants, filed by RACHEAL STRONG. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons To Angels to Your Door, #3 Proposed Summons To Pinner)(Weldy, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
