WEBB v. MCCAFFERTY et al
| MERLE ROSS WEBB |
| KELLY MCCAFFERTY, ARAYANNA MOSS and AKILAH LAMAR |
| 1:2024cv00269 |
| February 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RECEIPT #9391 for Initial Partial Filing fee in the amount of $15.73, paid by MERLE WEBB. (CCG) |
Filing 10
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR ASSISTANCE WITH RECRUITING COUNSEL: Mr. Webb's motion, dkt. #9 , is DENIED without prejudice because it provides neither sufficient information to make a determination on the merits, nor an acknowledgement of the conditions of the appointment of counsel. Mr. Webb may renew his motion for the appointment of counsel that the Court will send to him along with his copy of this Order, after he has resolved the initial partial filing fee, after the Court has screened his complaint, and after the defendants have answered. At this time, Mr. Webb should continue his efforts to recruit counsel on his own. The clerk is directed to send Mr. Webb a blank form motion for assistance recruiting counsel form. See order. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/26/2024. (Attachments: #1 Blank Form Motion for Counsel) (LF)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff MERLE ROSS WEBB. (AJG) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis -The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. [ #3 ], is granted to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Fifteen Dollars and Seventy-Three Cents ($15.73). See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1); Whitaker v. Dempsey, 83 F.4th 1059, 1061 (7th Cir. 2023) (stating that even a prisoner with $2000 in assets might be eligible to proceed in forma pauperis). The plaintiff shall have through March 20, 2024, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Copy to Finance Dept. via Email. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/21/2024. (SWM)
|
| Filing 7 Consent to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by MERLE ROSS WEBB. (BAA) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (JRT) |
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MERLE ROSS WEBB. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(CCG) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against AKILAH LAMAR, KELLY MCCAFFERTY, ARAYANNA MOSS, filed by MERLE ROSS WEBB. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(CCG) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by MERLE ROSS WEBB located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by MERLE ROSS WEBB to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
