LIDDLE et al v. CLARK et al
Plaintiff: PAUL A. LIDDLE and WYONA LIDDLE
Defendant: RICHARD A. CLARK and PZARK MOTOR LINES, INC.
Case Number: 1:2024cv00283
Filed: February 13, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Referring Judge: M Kendra Klump
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 23 U.S.C. ยง 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 20, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Patrick Casey on behalf of Defendants RICHARD A. CLARK, PZARK MOTOR LINES, INC.. (Casey, Michael)
February 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CLOSED ORDER TRANSFERRING DIVISION - The Clerk therefore SHALL TRANSFER this case to the Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division. New cause number is 2:24-cv-57-MPB-MKK. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 2/15/2024.(LBT)
February 14, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Darron S. Stewart on behalf of Plaintiffs PAUL A. LIDDLE, WYONA LIDDLE. (Stewart, Darron)
February 14, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas J. Wagner on behalf of Plaintiffs PAUL A. LIDDLE, WYONA LIDDLE. (Wagner, Nicholas)
February 14, 2024 Filing 4 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (KAA)
February 14, 2024 Filing 3 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James Patrick Hanlon. (KAA)
February 14, 2024 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (KAA)
February 13, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from State Court from Vigo Superior/Circuit Court, case number 84D03-2401-000083, filed by PZARK MOTOR LINES, INC.. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-8025455) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Affidavit Affidavit of Counsel, #3 Envelope State File, #4 Exhibit Notice of Removal- state, #5 Exhibit Letter From Plaintiff Counsel, #6 Exhibit 7.1 Disclosures, #7 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet)(Casey, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LIDDLE et al v. CLARK et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PAUL A. LIDDLE
Represented By: Darron S. Stewart
Represented By: Jacqueline Wiley
Represented By: Nicholas J. Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WYONA LIDDLE
Represented By: Darron S. Stewart
Represented By: Jacqueline Wiley
Represented By: Nicholas J. Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD A. CLARK
Represented By: Michael Patrick Casey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PZARK MOTOR LINES, INC.
Represented By: Michael Patrick Casey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?