UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NAVISTAR, INC. et al
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: NAVISTAR, INC., FORD MOTOR COMPANY and ARCONIC CORPORATION
Case Number: 1:2024cv00285
Filed: February 13, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Referring Judge: Crystal S Wildeman
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 9601 Comprehensive Environmental Compen/Resp/Liab (CERCLA) (Definitions)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2024 Filing 9 FINAL JUDGMENT - The Unopposed Motion to Enter Consent Decree (Dkt. #7 ) is granted. Upon entry of this Consent Decree by the Court, this Consent Decree shall constitute the final judgment between and among the United States and the Settling Defendants. The Court enters final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 and 58. (See Judgment.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/1/2024. (JSR)
April 1, 2024 Filing 8 MARGINAL ENTRY - The Unopposed Motion to Enter Consent Decree (Dkt. #7 ) is granted and this case is closed. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/1/2024. (JSR)
March 29, 2024 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Enter Consent Decree, filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Ricci, Samantha)
February 14, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Samantha Morgan Ricci on behalf of Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Ricci, Samantha)
February 14, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree, filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, re #1 Complaint. (Ricci, Samantha)
February 14, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by J. Taylor Kirklin on behalf of Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Kirklin, J. Taylor)
February 14, 2024 Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (BAA)
February 14, 2024 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (BAA)
February 13, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (No fee paid with this filing) - no fee required (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Consent Decree, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ricci, Samantha) Modified on 2/14/2024 (BAA).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NAVISTAR, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Samantha Morgan Ricci
Represented By: J. Taylor Kirklin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NAVISTAR, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARCONIC CORPORATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?