NATARE CORPORATION v. WRIGHTFIELD LIMITED
Plaintiff: NATARE CORPORATION
Defendant: Wrightfield Limited
Case Number: 1:2024cv00286
Filed: February 13, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Referring Judge: Mario Garcia
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2024 Filing 20 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION to Stay In Favor of Mediation and if Necessary, Arbitration , filed by Plaintiff NATARE CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Email Correspondence)(McNeil, Andrew)
March 28, 2024 Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Tyler Lynn Salway on behalf of Defendant WRIGHTFIELD LIMITED. (Salway, Tyler)
March 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME - This matter is before the Court on the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time filed by Plaintiff, Natare Corporation; and the Court having considered the Motion and being duly advised now GRANTS the Motion #17 . Plaintiff's response to the Motion to Stay (Dkt. #14 ) is due by April 9, 2024. (See Order.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 3/18/2024. (JSR)
March 15, 2024 Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to April 9, 2024 to Respond to #14 Motion to Stay, filed by Plaintiff NATARE CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Extension of Time)(McNeil, Andrew) Modified on 3/18/2024 to create link to related motion (LBT).
March 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - Initial Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 4/23/2024 at 9:00 AM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. (See Order.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Mario Garcia on 03/12/2024.(AJG)
March 12, 2024 Filing 15 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #14 MOTION to Stay In Favor of Mediation and if Necessary, Arbitration , filed by Defendant WRIGHTFIELD LIMITED. (Van Nostrand, Aaron)
March 12, 2024 Filing 14 MOTION to Stay In Favor of Mediation and if Necessary, Arbitration, filed by Defendant WRIGHTFIELD LIMITED. (Van Nostrand, Aaron)
March 12, 2024 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron Van Nostrand on behalf of Defendant WRIGHTFIELD LIMITED. (Van Nostrand, Aaron)
March 1, 2024 Filing 12 NOTICE of Removal (Amended), filed by Defendant WRIGHTFIELD LIMITED, re #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Record( Appearance, Docket, Complaint, Summons), #2 Exhibit B- State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit C- Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D- Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal) (Clapp, Abigail)
February 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DIRECTING FILING OF AMENDED REMOVAL NOTICE - The Court ORDERS Defendant to file an Amended Notice of Removal within fourteen (14) days of the date of this entry, which addresses the issue outlined in this Order by properly alleging a basis for diversity jurisdiction. See Order for additional information. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/20/2024.(SWM)
February 20, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE of Unopposed Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Plead, filed by Defendant WRIGHTFIELD LIMITED, re #1 Notice of Removal. (Clapp, Abigail)
February 14, 2024 Filing 9 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by NATARE CORPORATION. (McNeil, Andrew)
February 14, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Troy Michael Miller on behalf of Plaintiff NATARE CORPORATION. (Miller, Troy)
February 14, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew M. McNeil on behalf of Plaintiff NATARE CORPORATION. (McNeil, Andrew)
February 14, 2024 Filing 6 Amended Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by WRIGHTFIELD LIMITED. (Clapp, Abigail) Modified on 2/15/2024 (LBT).
February 14, 2024 Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LBT)
February 14, 2024 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LBT)
February 13, 2024 Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Wrightfield Limited. (Clapp, Abigail)
February 13, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Abigail A. Clapp on behalf of Defendant Wrightfield Limited. (Clapp, Abigail)
February 13, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion County Superior Court 4, case number 49D04-2311-PL-045743, filed by Wrightfield Limited. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-8026972) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Record( Appearance, Docket, Complaint, Summons), #2 Exhibit B- State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit C- Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D- Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal)(Clapp, Abigail)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NATARE CORPORATION v. WRIGHTFIELD LIMITED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NATARE CORPORATION
Represented By: Andrew M. McNeil
Represented By: Troy Michael Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wrightfield Limited
Represented By: Abigail A. Clapp
Represented By: Aaron Van Nostrand
Represented By: Tyler Lynn Salway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?