ROBERTSON v. KNIGHT et al
| TIMOTHY ROBERTSON |
| WENDY KNIGHT, ANDREW COLE, SCHEPPER and SWENSON |
| 1:2024cv00295 |
| February 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Richard L Young |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER - Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to pay the initial partial filing fee, dkt. [ #10 ], is DENIED AS MOOT. The Court has already received the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff. Dkt. 9 . The motion for clarification, dkt. [ #12 ], is GRANTED to the extent that the Clerk is directed to enclose a copy of the Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form for this case, dkt. [ #5 ], with Plaintiff's copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 4/9/2024. (Attachments: #1 Form - Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge) (SWM)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Clarification, filed by Plaintiff TIMOTHY ROBERTSON. (AAS) |
| Filing 11 Copy Request for Docket Sheet, filed by Plaintiff TIMOTHY ROBERTSON. (Attachments: #1 Public Docket Sheet) (BAA) Modified on 4/8/2024 to correct event (BAA). |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to, filed by Plaintiff TIMOTHY ROBERTSON. (BAA) |
| Filing 9 RECEIPT #9626 for Initial Partial Filing fee in the amount of $10.87, paid by Sheritha Annette Patton on behalf of Timothy Robertson. (CCG) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (MEH) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis - #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED to the extent that the plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Ten Dollars and Eighty-Seven Cents ($10.87). The plaintiff shall have through March 28, 2024, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. See Order for details. Signed by District Judge Richard L Young on 2/28/2024. (LBT)
|
| Filing 6 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff TIMOTHY ROBERTSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(CCG) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT by TIMOTHY ROBERTSON. (CCG) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against ANDREW COLE, WENDY KNIGHT, SCHEPPER, SWENSON, filed by TIMOTHY ROBERTSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(CCG) |
| Filing 1 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by TIMOTHY ROBERTSON located at Correctional Industrial Facility (CIF). Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by TIMOTHY ROBERTSON to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
