TARRANCE v. FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE INC.
| MARILYNN E. TARRANCE |
| FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE INC. and CHRISTINE WANG |
| 1:2024cv00317 |
| February 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendant FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE INC.. (Leighty, Hilary) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Virginia Talley on behalf of Defendant FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE INC.. (Talley, Virginia) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Hilary Kathryn Leighty on behalf of Defendant FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE INC.. (Leighty, Hilary) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy Joan Adolay on behalf of Defendant FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE INC.. (Adolay, Amy) |
Filing 11
ENTRY SCREENING COMPLAINT AND DENYING MOTION FOR ASSISTANCE AS PREMATURE: Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Christine Wang are DISMISSED. The clerk is directed to terminate Christine Wang as a defendant on the docket. Plaintiff's claims against Franciscan Alliance Inc. SHALL PROCEED. The docket reflects that Plaintiff has already served Franciscan via certified mail (Dkt. #10 ). Plaintiff's Motion for Assistance with Recruiting Counsel (Dkt. #3 ) is DENIED as premature. Plaintiff may file a renewed motion requesting the Court's assistance in recruiting counsel as the case develops. See Order. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/5/2024. Copy mailed to Plaintiff. (LF)
|
| Filing 10 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by MARILYNN E. TARRANCE. FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE INC. served on 3/29/2024; CHRISTINE WANG served on 3/29/2024. (LF) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE INC., CHRISTINE WANG. (DJH) |
| Filing 8 RECEIPT #9650 for Filing fee in the amount of $405.00, paid by MARILYNN E. TARRANCE. (CCG) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (TRG) |
| Filing 6 ENTRY DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - On February 21, 2024, Plaintiff Marilynn E. Tarrance ("Plaintiff") filed a Request to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying the Filing Fee (Dkt. 2). Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. #2 , is denied because she has sufficient income and/or resources to prepay the entire filing fee of $405.00. The Plaintiff shall have through Friday, March 29, 2024, in which to pay the filing fee to the Clerk of the Court (SEE ENTRY). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/28/2024. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. (DWH) |
| Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Assistance with Recruiting Counsel, filed by Plaintiff MARILYNN E. TARRANCE. (CCG) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff MARILYNN E. TARRANCE. (CCG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FRANCISCAN ALLIANCE INC., filed by MARILYNN E. TARRANCE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit)(CCG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
