SIMEON v. MAYORKAS et al
ROSENA SIMEON |
ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, CONNIE NOLAN, MARY BETH BRENNAN SENG, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES |
1:2024cv00448 |
March 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
M Kendra Klump |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT served on Defendants on 3/18/2024, filed by ROSENA SIMEON. (Chakravartula, Neela) |
![]() |
Filing 6 MOTION for Attorney(s) Neela Chakravartula to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number AINSDC-8065541), filed by Plaintiff ROSENA SIMEON. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Chakravartula, Neela) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (LF) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LF) |
Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (LF) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jess Hunter-Bowman on behalf of Plaintiff ROSENA SIMEON. (Hunter-Bowman, Jess) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-8063757) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Combined proposed summonses)(Hunter-Bowman, Jess) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.