FRANKLIN v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION

Plaintiff: JANICE FRANKLIN
Defendant: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Case Number: 1:2024cv00499
Filed: March 18, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Matthew P Brookman
Referring Judge: M Kendra Klump
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2024 Filing 9 ORDER - Plaintiff filed a Complaint alleging diversity jurisdiction. However, Plaintiff did not properly plead Defendant's citizenship. The Court ordered Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint. In her Amended Complaint, Plaintiff has again failed to properly allege diversity jurisdiction. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Amended Complaint without prejudice. Plaintiff is GRANTED LEAVE to file a Second Amended Complaint by May 27, 2024, which addresses the issues outlined in this Order and properly alleges a basis for this Court's diversity jurisdiction. SEE ORDER. Signed by District Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 04/30/2024.(AAT)
April 24, 2024 Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, filed by JANICE FRANKLIN.(Raizner, Jeffrey)
March 27, 2024 Filing 7 ORDER: Plaintiff filed a Complaint alleging diversity jurisdiction. However, Plaintiff did not properly plead Defendant's citizenship. Rather, she pled that Defendant "NCAA is a citizen of Indiana," (Docket No. 1, Compl. at ECF p. 3) but did not identify and list the citizenship of each of Defendant's members. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint by April 24, 2024, which properly alleges a basis for this Court's diversity jurisdiction and alleges the jurisdictional amount exclusive of interest and costs. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 3/27/2024.(LF)
March 19, 2024 Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before District Judge Matthew P. Brookman. (AAS) (Main Document 6 replaced on 3/19/2024) (AAS).
March 19, 2024 Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (AAS)
March 19, 2024 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AAS)
March 19, 2024 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION. (AAS)
March 18, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey L. Raizner on behalf of Plaintiff JANICE FRANKLIN. (Raizner, Jeffrey)
March 18, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, filed by JANICE FRANKLIN. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Raizner, Jeffrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FRANKLIN v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JANICE FRANKLIN
Represented By: Jeffrey L. Raizner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?