CONWELL v. SEVIER et al
CHRISTOPHER LEO CONWELL |
MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH, RAY DAVIS, G. CECIL, S. KIDD, LONG, COURTNEY GARD, JOSEPH, O. POWELL, ELLEN KERIS, K. ENGLES, WOOTEN, GILBERT, THIBEAULT, TYRONE THOMPSON, RICHARD BROWN, CHRISTINA REAGLE and JACK HENDRIX |
1:2024cv00501 |
March 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, filed by Plaintiff CHRISTOPHER LEO CONWELL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DJH) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff CHRISTOPHER LEO CONWELL. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, Offender Activity, #2 Envelope)(DJH) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against RICHARD BROWN, G. CECIL, RAY DAVIS, K. ENGLES, JENNIFER FRENCH, COURTNEY GARD, GILBERT, JACK HENDRIX, JOSEPH, ELLEN KERIS, S. KIDD, LONG, O. POWELL, CHRISTINA REAGLE, MARK SEVIER, THIBEAULT, TYRONE THOMPSON, WOOTEN, filed by CHRISTOPHER LEO CONWELL. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit -- letter from ACLU, #2 Exhibits -- envelopes, #3 Envelope for mailing to Clerk's Office)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.