BMO BANK N.A. v. D & H EXPRESS INC, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION ET AL
| BMO BANK N.A. |
| D&H Xpress Inc, a California corporation, D&H Xpress Inc, an Indiana corporation and Harjit Singh |
| 1:2024cv00622 |
| April 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by BMO BANK N.A.. (Borkowski, John) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John W. Borkowski on behalf of Plaintiff BMO BANK N.A.. (Borkowski, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Verified Complaint for Breach of Contract, Declaratory Judgment, Replevin, Specific Performance, and Injunction against All Defendants, filed by BMO BANK N.A.. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-8107645) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - First Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Second Agreement, #3 Exhibit C - Third Agreement, #4 Exhibit D - Fourth Agreement, #5 Exhibit E - Certificates of Title for the Collateral, #6 Exhibit F - Continuing Guaranties, #7 Exhibit G - Plaintiff's notice to Defendants dated March 14, 2024, #8 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Proposed Summons Summons - D&H Xpress Inc, #10 Proposed Summons Summons - D&H Xpress Inc, #11 Proposed Summons Summons - Harjit Singh)(Borkowski, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
