WALTON v. JP MORGAN CHASE N.A. ET AL
DEBORAH WALTON |
JP MORGAN CHASE N.A., CODOLIS LAW, JAMIE DIMON, TED SWIECICHOWSKI and RICHARD E. HENDRICKSON |
1:2024cv00646 |
April 16, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
James R Sweeney |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (BAA) |
Filing 14 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (BAA) |
Filing 13 Case transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 1:24-cv-02078. Original file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of Southern District of Indiana.(tg) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #12 Notice of Appeal..(nd) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for #12 Notice of Appeal filed by Deborah Walton were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals..(nd) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEAL from #11 Memorandum Opinion & Order. Document filed by Deborah Walton. Filing fee $ 605.00, receipt number 28116. Form D-P is due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit..(nd) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 11. Mailed to: Deborah Walton 12878 Mayfair Lane Carmel, IN 46032. (tk) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when she seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana and to close the case in this District. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/3/2024) (tg) Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court for processing. [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Filing 10 PLAINTIFF DEBORAH WALTON'S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE MOTION TO JUDGE FURMAN'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: #8 Order to Show Cause,,,, Set Deadlines/Hearings,,,. Document filed by Deborah Walton..(kgo) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Filing 9 PLAINTIFF DEBORAH WALTON'S RESPONSE MOTION TO JUDGE FURMAN'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Document filed by Deborah Walton. (jca) (Main Document 9 replaced on 4/1/2024) (nb). [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 8. Mailed to: Deborah Walton 12878 Mayfair Lane Carmel, IN 46032. (jwh) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Filing 8 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Court directs Plaintiff to show cause, no later than April 17, 2024, why this action should not be transferred, under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a), to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, and why the abovementioned filing injunction should not issue. Two declaration forms are attached to this order for Plaintiff's convenience. In the meantime, all other dates and deadlines - including Defendants' deadlines to answer - are stayed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when she seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 3/27/2024) (tg) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Filing 7 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent JPMorgan Chase & Co. for JP Morgan Chase N.A.. Document filed by JP Morgan Chase N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Certificate of Service).(Parker, Scott) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Filing 6 LETTER addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Scott W. Parker, Esq. dated March 26, 2024 re: Request to Transfer case sua sponte from S.D.N.Y. to S.D. Ind.. Document filed by Jamie Dimon, JP Morgan Chase N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Preclusion Orders, #2 Exhibit B, Transfer and Dismissal Order, #3 Affidavit of Service).(Parker, Scott) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Filing 5 FILING ERROR - CORPORATE PARENT/OTHER AFFILIATE NOT ADDED - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Jamie Dimon, JP Morgan Chase N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Certificate of Service).(Parker, Scott) Modified on 3/26/2024 (lb). [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Scott Wesley Parker on behalf of Jamie Dimon, JP Morgan Chase N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Certificate of Service).(Parker, Scott) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Notice to Attorney Scott Wesley Parker to RE-FILE Document No. #5 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the corporate parent/other affiliate was not added;. Re-file the document using the event type Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - attach the correct signed PDF - when prompted with the message "Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?", select the Yes or No radio button - If Yes - enter the corporate parent/other affiliate, click the Search button - select the correct corporate parent/other affiliate name from the search results list or if no person found, create a new corporate parent/other affiliate - select the party to whom the corporate parent/other affiliate should be linked - add corporate parent/other affiliate names one at a time. (lb) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Codilis Law, Richard Henderson, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Deborah Walton. (sc) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Transmission to Pro Se Assistants. Transmitted re: #2 Request for Issuance of Summons, to the Pro Se Assistants for processing. (sc) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Codolis Law, Jamie Dimon, Richard E. Hendrickson, JP Morgan Chase N.A., Ted Swiecichowski. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number 27561)Document filed by Deborah Walton. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Case Designated ECF. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Magistrate Judge Gary Stein is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sac) [Transferred from New York Southern on 4/16/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.