HARRELL v. HAYGOOD et al
MAQUEL HARRELL |
STACEY HAYGOOD, BAYYINNAH GERMANY, NATALIE ROBERTS, KATHLEEN DESAUTELS, SCOTT JAMES PRESTON, MICHAEL COLLINS and BRAD ROBERTS |
1:2024cv00673 |
April 17, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Cases, filed by Defendants KATHLEEN DESAUTELS, BAYYINNAH GERMANY, STACEY HAYGOOD, NATALIE ROBERTS (Preston, Scott) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott James Preston on behalf of Defendants KATHLEEN DESAUTELS, BAYYINNAH GERMANY, STACEY HAYGOOD, NATALIE ROBERTS. (Preston, Scott) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court, case number 49D04-2401-CT-002161, filed by KATHLEEN DESAUTELS, STACEY HAYGOOD, BAYYINNAH GERMANY, NATALIE ROBERTS. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-8121701) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons filed in State Court, #2 Exhibit B - Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit C (Part 1_Exs 1-21) - State Court Record, #4 Exhibit C (Part 2_Exs 22-33) - State Court Record, #5 Exhibit C (Part 3_Exs 34-38) - State Court Record, #6 Exhibit C (Part 4_Exs 39-54) - State Court Record, #7 Exhibit C (Part 5_Exs 55-63) - State Court Record, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Preston, Scott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.