DARDEN v. FROST, et al.
| DEDRICK K. DARDEN |
| DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, DEITZ and FROST |
| 1:2024cv01134 |
| July 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE - This case is assigned for a telephonic initial pretrial conference before United States Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on October 3, 2024, at 9:30 a.m. (Eastern Time). Parties shall participate in this conference by counsel. The information needed by counsel of record to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by separate notification. The parties shall file the proposed CMP no less than three business days prior to the pretrial conference. Filing of the plan will not automatically vacate the pretrial conference. The conference will remain set unless specifically vacated by the Court, which is unlikely. Plaintiff's counsel shall appear at the pretrial conference prepared to make a settlement proposal if no proposal has yet been made. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 8/20/2024. (See Order.) (BAA)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Exhaustion Defense, filed by Defendants DEITZ, FROST, DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, re #10 Entry. (Willfond, Adam) |
|
Filing 10
ENTRY DIRECTING DEVELOPMENT OF EXHAUSTION DEFENSE AND ISSUING PARTIAL STAY - The exhaustion defense will be resolved pursuant to the following schedule. The defendants shall have through August 30, 2024, in which to either: (SEE ORDER). The failure to pursue any of these options by the above deadline constitutes an abandonment of the exhaustion defense. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 8/2/2024.(TPS)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint , filed by All Defendants.(Willfond, Adam) |
| Filing 8 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Senior District Judge Jane E Magnus-Stinson. (MRI) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendants Correctional Officer Deitz, Correctional Officer Frost, Sherrif Dennis Quakenbush. (Willfond, Adam) |
| Filing 6 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Pending Motions, filed by Defendants Correctional Officer Deitz, Correctional Officer Frost, Sherrif Dennis Quakenbush (Willfond, Adam) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Notice of Service of Notice of Removal on State Court, filed by Defendants Correctional Officer Deitz, Correctional Officer Frost, Sherrif Dennis Quakenbush (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Removal to State Court) (Willfond, Adam) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam Scott Willfond on behalf of Defendants Correctional Officer Deitz, Correctional Officer Frost, Sherrif Dennis Quakenbush. (Willfond, Adam) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hamilton County Superior Court 1, case number 29D01-2406-CT-006446, filed by All Defendants. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-8239609) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Record State Court Record, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff's Complaint)(Willfond, Adam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
