TAEBEL v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
Plaintiff: MITCH TAEBEL
Defendant: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
Case Number: 1:2024cv01331
Filed: August 2, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: M Kendra Klump
Referring Judge: James R Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2024 Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (CCG)
August 6, 2024 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (CCG)
August 1, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, filed by MITCH TAEBEL. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(CCG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: TAEBEL v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MITCH TAEBEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?