RAMIREZ v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
| BRANDON RAMIREZ |
| INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, ANTHONY MACLEMORE, ZACHARY TAYLOR and SCOTT HARTMAN |
| 1:2024cv01395 |
| August 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE - A Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference is set for 11/18/2024 at 2:30 PM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. Parties shall participate in this conference by counsel. The information needed by counsel of record to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by separate notification. The parties themselves may participate at their option. (See Order.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 10/9/2024. (JSR)
|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by John P. Lowrey on behalf of Defendants CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, SCOTT HARTMAN, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE, ANTHONY MACLEMORE, ZACHARY TAYLOR. (Lowrey, John) |
| Filing 18 Summons Issued as to SCOTT HARTMAN, ANTHONY MACLEMORE, ZACHARY TAYLOR. (JSR) |
| Filing 17 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to SCOTT HARTMAN. (Bushing, Shaun) Modified on 9/27/2024 - Updated dkt text (JSR). |
| Filing 16 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to ZACHARY TAYLOR. (Bushing, Shaun) |
| Filing 15 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to ANTHONY MACLEMORE. (Bushing, Shaun) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time re Filing a response to pleading defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a), filed by Defendants CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, SCOTT HARTMAN, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE, ANTHONY MACLEMORE, ZACHARY TAYLOR. (Newhart, Brandon) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Brandon Robert Newhart on behalf of Defendants CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, SCOTT HARTMAN, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE, ANTHONY MACLEMORE, ZACHARY TAYLOR. (Newhart, Brandon) |
| Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on City of Indianapolis on 09/03/2024, filed by BRANDON RAMIREZ. (Bushing, Shaun) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department on 09/03/2024, filed by BRANDON RAMIREZ. (Bushing, Shaun) |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS. (MRI) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE. (JSR) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS. (Bushing, Shaun) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE. (Bushing, Shaun) |
| Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Senior District Judge Jane E Magnus-Stinson. (MRI) |
| Filing 5 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by BRANDON RAMIREZ. (Bushing, Shaun) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Shaun Bushing on behalf of Plaintiff BRANDON RAMIREZ. (Bushing, Shaun) |
| Filing 3 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AINSDC-8290981) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bushing, Shaun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
