FOLLETTE v. WARDEN et al
DUSTIN ALAN FOLLETTE |
JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2, WARDEN, MEDICAL STAFF, JANE DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 1 |
1:2024cv01434 |
August 22, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
Sarah Evans Barker |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 7 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (Copy sent to plaintiff via US mail). (JRT) |
Filing 6 Notice to File Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (RAGS) (JRB) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (JRB) |
Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Indiana Northern; Case Number 3:24-cv-00696. Original file copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
![]() |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Prisoner Trust Account Ledger attached) by Plaintiff Dustin Alan Follette. (kmt) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 8/22/2024.] |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, Medical Staff, Warden, filed by Dustin Alan Follette. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter, #2 Envelope)(File stamped copy with case number sent to Follette)(kmt) [Transferred from Indiana Northern on 8/22/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.