SCOTT v. WARDEN
| JOSEPH SCOTT |
| WARDEN |
| 1:2026cv00421 |
| March 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Crystal S Wildeman |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Substitution of Appearance by Benjamin Myron Lane Jones replacing Natalie F. Weiss on behalf of WARDEN (Jones, Benjamin) |
| Filing 11 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Respondent WARDEN. (Weiss, Natalie) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Respondent WARDEN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Hearing Report)(Weiss, Natalie) |
| Filing 9 Address updated for Joseph Scott from Westville Correctional Facility to New Castle Correctional Facility based on the DOC website. Dkts. #3 , #4 , #5 and #6 resent to Scott at New Castle. (JRT) Modified on 3/27/2026 (JRT). |
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as undeliverable. #4 NOTICE Regarding Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement, #3 Magistrate Judge's Notice of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction, #5 Notice to Pro se Litigant sent to JOSEPH SCOTT at New Castle CF. (SAM) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Natalie Faye Weiss on behalf of Respondent WARDEN. (Weiss, Natalie) |
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Disciplinary) Joseph Scott's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his disciplinary conviction in disciplinary case number CIC-24-08-003093 at Correctional Industrial Facility. His filing at docket #2 , which the Court interprets as a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, is GRANTED. The custodian of petitioner is directed to answer the allegations of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted.( Show Cause Response due by 4/15/2026.) Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 3/4/2026. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. (AAS)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. (DJH) |
| Filing 4 Notice Regarding Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (KLS) (DJH) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with Trust Account Statement, filed by Petitioner JOSEPH SCOTT. (DJH) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by JOSEPH SCOTT. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Cover Page)(DJH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SCOTT v. WARDEN | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JOSEPH SCOTT | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Myron Lane Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
