ANDERSON v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
ANICE ANDERSON |
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and THE ROSE-HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GROUP DISABILITY INCOME INSURANCE PLAN |
2:2008cv00471 |
December 10, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
Adams |
William G. Hussmann |
William T. Lawrence |
None |
Federal Question |
29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 132 ENTRY ON MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES; Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (Docket No. 122) is GRANTED. Attorney O'Ryan is entitled to fees in the amount of $41,4481 and costs in the amount of $616.16; Attorney Yonally is entitled to fees in the amount of $15,879.75. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/10/2011.(see entry for more details) (VS) |
Filing 119 ENTRY ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; granting 72 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 78 Motion for oral argument; denying 85 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 104 Motion objection to Magistrate Judge's Order; This case is REMANDED to Hartford for additional findings and explanation on Andersons application for benefits. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/10/2010. (VS) |
Filing 97 ORDER denying 80 Motion to Unseal Documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr., on 4/6/2010. (NRN) |
Filing 39 ORDER granting 20 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr on 6/10/2009. (TMD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.