POWELL v. HALL et al
| ANDRE VANCE POWELL |
| STEPHEN HALL, HENRY NUNNERY, MICHAEL OSBURN, PHIL SLAVENS, ALISIA LAWRENCE, CHRIS WILLIAMS, ALAN TOFFLEMIRE, KNIGHT, ESTER HINTON and BUDDY LEE |
| 2:2009cv00069 |
| March 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| Putnam |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Richard L. Young |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
222
ORDER denying 220 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/10/2012. Copy via US Mail to Andre Powell. (cc: USCA re: CA #12-1667.) (TMA)
|
|
Filing
204
ORDER denying 186 Motion to Amend/Correct; and denying 187 Supplement. (Plaintiff served via US Mail) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/28/2012. (SMD) Modified on 2/29/2012 (SMD).
|
|
Filing
194
ORDER denying 189 Motion to clerk and court to acknowledge attached copy of submission as an 8/15/11 file stamped part of the record; denying 190 Motion to supplement; and denying 191 Motion to Strike. Plaintiff shall have through 12/8/11 to f ile a notarized statement or declaration setting forth the date that he deposited the motion to supplement the motion to alter or amend judgment in the prison mail system and whether he paid first class postage. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/29/2011. (SMD)
|
|
Filing
181
Entry Discussing Objection to Representation of Defendants; Andre Powell, the plaintiff in this civil rights action brought against employees of a State agency, the Indiana Department of Correction, argues that the Indiana Attorney General is not au thorized to represent the defendants. He seeks an order declaring all actions taken in that representation "void" and terminating that representation. Because the complaint alleges that the defendants acted under color of state law when the y violated the plaintiff's federally secured rights, there is no basis on which to conclude that the Indiana Attorney General erred in filing an appearance on their behalf, Powell's objection to that representation is thus overruled. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/17/2011. (SEE ENTRY FOR DETAILS)(Copy to plaintiff vis U. S. mail)(VS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
