ARNAOUT et al v. WARDEN
| ENAAM ARNAOUT and RANDALL T ROYER |
| WARDEN |
| 2:2009cv00215 |
| June 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Vigo |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Larry J. McKinney |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
227
ORDER - The Court DENIES Mr. Lindh's Motion to Hold Defendant in Contempt, [dkt. 209], as the Court finds its earlier order was not unambiguous and required clarification. Within this order, the Court has clarified its earlier order with an unambiguous command, and it ORDERS the Warden to consider his current policy in light of that command and comply within thirty days. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/19/2013. (RSF)
|
|
Filing
200
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. Court finds that the Warden's policy prohibiting daily group prayer by Muslim inmates violates RFRA. The Warden will have 60 days in which to employ anew policy with respect to daily group prayer for Muslims. The Court is issuing today a permanent injunction to take effect in 60 days. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/11/2013.(SMD)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 106 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 112 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Mr. Lindhs Motion for Summary Judgment, [dkt. 106], and DENIES the Wardens Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, [dkt. 112]. The Court finds as a matter of law that recitation of the five daily Muslim group prayers is a religious exercise rooted in Mr. Lindhs sincerely held religious beliefs. However, genuin e issues of material fact exist regarding whether the Warden has substantially burdened Mr. Lindhs exercise of religion. And the Warden has not satisfied his burden of showing either that the policy on group prayer is in furtherance of the compelling governmental interest of prison security, or that he has used the least restrictive means to further the governments interest. (SEE ORDER FOR MORE DETAILS.). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/3/2012. (MRI) Modified on 2/3/2012 (MRI).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
