BURGE v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY
Petitioner: TROY BURGE
Respondent: WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY
Case Number: 2:2010cv00120
Filed: April 28, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Terre Haute Office
Presiding Judge: William T. Lawrence
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ENTRY Discussing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; ORDER granting petitioner's 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Action is dismissed without prejudice; Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 4/30/2010. (NKD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BURGE v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: TROY BURGE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?