REID v. EMMERICH et al
KENNETH R. REID |
LT. E. EMMERICH, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER USREY and COUNSELOR WHITE |
2:2010cv00144 |
May 26, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Terre Haute Office |
William T. Lawrence |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ENTRY Discussing Motion for Summary Judgment; The court, having considered the pleadings, the defendants' motion, the briefs pertaining to such motion and the evidentiary record, and being duly advised, now finds that the motion for summary judgment 17 must be granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/12/2011. (NKD) |
Filing 3 ENTRY dismissing insufficient Claims and Directing Further Proceedings; granting; 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, no assessment of even a partial initial filing fee is made at this time; official capacity claims fail to state a cla im upon which relief can be granted and are dismissed; any claim pursuant to the Fourth Amendment is dismisseed; no partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to claims resolved in paragraph 4 of this entry; clerk designated to issue process to defendants Emmerich, Usrey, and Counselor White, and Marshal shall serve process. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 6/1/2010. (VS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.