BARKER v. McPHERSON et al
Plaintiff: STEVEN L. BARKER
Defendant: SENIOR OFFICER BOBO, BUREAU OF PRISONS, JANE/JOHN DOE, LT. EMMERICH, S.I.A. JEAGER and LT McPHERSON
Case Number: 2:2010cv00314
Filed: November 22, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Terre Haute Office
Presiding Judge: Tim A. Baker
Presiding Judge: William T. Lawrence
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 105 SECOND FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - The Court finds in favor of Barker and against the United States on his claim for assault and battery (Count II). Barker's compensatory damages total $1,500.00. The Court finds in favor of the United States and against the Plaintiff on his remaining claims for gross negligence (Count IV) and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count V). Pursuant to the FTCA's judgment bar rule, judgment will be entered in favor of Lt. Emmerich and against Barker on his claim for excessive force (Count I). A separate judgment shall now issue. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/4/2015.(AH) Modified on 5/5/2015 (AH).
January 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 100 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - The Court finds in favor of Barker and against Lt. Emmerich on his claim for excessive force (Count I). Barker's compensatory damages total $1,500.00. The Court finds in favor of the United States of America and against the Plaintiff on his remaining claims for assault and battery (Count II), gross negligence (Count IV), and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count V) under the FTCA. A separate judgment shall now issue. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/29/2015. (AH)
October 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ENTRY on Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss - This cause is before the Court on Defendants' motion to dismiss certain claims in 78 Plaintiff's amended complaint. The motion is fully briefed, and the Court, being duly advised, GRANTS the motion. For the sake of clarity, the following claims remain: Count I - Violation of constitutional rights for the use of excessive force and/or failing to intervene against Lt. Emmerich, Lt. McPherson, and Officer Bobo. Count II - As sault and battery against the United States. Count IV - Gross negligence against the United States (but limited to the extent discussed above in Section III.4). Count V - Intentional infliction of emotional distress against the United States. The parties are also reminded of their pretrial deadlines.**SEE ENTRY** Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 10/09/2014. (AH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BARKER v. McPHERSON et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STEVEN L. BARKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SENIOR OFFICER BOBO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BUREAU OF PRISONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JANE/JOHN DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LT. EMMERICH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S.I.A. JEAGER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LT McPHERSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?