CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. MASSAGE WAREHOUSE et al
CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA |
MASSAGE WAREHOUSE, BON VITAL, INC. and CHARKIT CHEMICAL CORPORATION |
2:2011cv00072 |
March 16, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Terre Haute Office |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
William G. Hussmann |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 ORDER granting 66 Motion for Leave to File Cross-Claims against Co-Defendants Charkit and Bon Vital. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr., on 3/6/2012. (NRN) |
Filing 33 ORDER TO FILE JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT; The Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer, and conduct whatever investigation necessary, to determine whether this Court has diversity jurisdiction. If the parties agree that diversity jurisdiction is pr oper, they shall file a joint jurisdictional statement by June 24, 2011 setting forth the basis for each of their citizenships and whether they agree that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs. If the parties cannot agree on their respective citizenships or the amount in controversy, any party who disagrees shall file a separate jurisdictional statement by June 24, 2011 setting forth its view regarding the citizenship of each of the parties and the amount in controversy. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/15/2011.(VS)(VS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.