THOMPSON v. LEVENHAGEN

THOMPSON v. LEVENHAGEN

Petitioner:	JEROME J. THOMPSON
Respondent:	MR. LEVENHAGEN
Case Number:	2:2011cv00076
Filed:	March 18, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Terre Haute Office
Presiding Judge:	Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 16, 2011	Filing 21 ENTRY Discussing Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus - The action Thompson filed is moot. The subsequent proceedings cannot be challenged in this case. An action which is moot must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The respondent's motion to dismiss 17 is therefore granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/16/2011.(Copy to petitioner via US mail)(VS)
July 8, 2011	Filing 15 ENTRY - The petitioner's motion to alter or amend judgment 14 is treated as a motion to reconsider the Order of June 29, 2011, and as so understood the motion is denied. No proper grounds for reconsideration have been shown. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/8/2011. (copy to petitioner via U.S. mail (VS)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 16, 2011

Filing 21 ENTRY Discussing Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus - The action Thompson filed is moot. The subsequent proceedings cannot be challenged in this case. An action which is moot must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The respondent's motion to dismiss 17 is therefore granted. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/16/2011.(Copy to petitioner via US mail)(VS)

July 8, 2011

Filing 15 ENTRY - The petitioner's motion to alter or amend judgment 14 is treated as a motion to reconsider the Order of June 29, 2011, and as so understood the motion is denied. No proper grounds for reconsideration have been shown. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/8/2011. (copy to petitioner via U.S. mail (VS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: THOMPSON v. LEVENHAGEN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: MR. LEVENHAGEN
Represented By:	Pamela Sue Moran
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: JEROME J. THOMPSON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?