STEVENS v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. et al
SAUL M. STEVENS |
VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. and PAUL HARTZLER |
2:2011cv00089 |
April 6, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Terre Haute Office |
Tim A. Baker |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 Entry on Motion for Summary Judgment and Directing Issuance of Final Judgment - granting 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. All claims have now been resolved. Judgment consistent with this Entry and with the Entry of May 4, 2011, dismissing the claim against the Vigo County Sheriff's Department, shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/1/2012. (RSF) |
Filing 3 ENTRY Discussing Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings; Plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The claim against the Vigo County Sheriff's Department is dismissed because there is no allegation of wrongdoing on its part. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the claim resolved in this Entry. The clerk is designated, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), to issue and serve process on Detective Paul Hartzler in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (d)(1). Process in this case shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms and this Entry. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/3/2011. (served by US mail)(NKD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.