KIDERLEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: STEVEN D. KIDERLEN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 2:2011cv00127
Filed: May 6, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Terre Haute Office
Presiding Judge: Denise K. LaRue
Presiding Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ENTRY Concerning Selected Matters - Copy of petitioner's statement filed on January 27, 2012 73 , shall be included with the distribution of this Entry. The post-judgment statement 73 , treated as a motion to alter or amend judgment, is denied. Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/13/2012.(RSF)
January 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ENTRY Discussing Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus - Petition is denied and action is dismissed. Judgment consistant with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/20/2012.(RSF)
January 12, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ENTRY and NOTICE - A copy of the petitioner's written inquiries filed on December 5, 2011 (dkt 54), shall be included with the petitioner's copy of this Entry. The court acknowledges the petitioner's inquiry, but is not positioned to provide an answer to him beyond this acknowledgment. (copy to Petitioner via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/12/2012. (JKS)
January 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER denying 57 Motion for Reconsideration. The tendered subpoenas by petitioner will not be issued. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/11/2012. (SMD)
August 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 44 Entry Discussing Petitioner's Omnibus Motion - the court, having reviewed the prior filings and orders in the action, having read and examined the omnibus motion, and being duly advised, now finds that the omnibus motion 37 must be denied. Kiderlen renews his request that he be released on bond while the action is pending. This request is denied. Kiderlen seeks interim relief in the form of suspending or invalidating his conviction. No final adjudication has been made in t his case, nor has the habeas petition been fully briefed. Kiderlen's request for that relief is denied. Motion for appointment of counsel is denied. Kiderlen seeks either the immediate issuance of a writ of habeas corpus or the is suance of an order directing his custodian to respond to the allegations of the habeas petition. The latter step has already been taken. The request for redundant relief is denied. Any relief which the omnibus motion could be construed as seeking which is not specifically addressed in this Entry is denied. Kiderlen's new address is shown in the distribution portion of this Entry. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/25/2011.(copy to petitioner via US mail) (VS)
May 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ENTRY Concerning Selected Matters; Mr. Kiderlen shall have through June 15, 2011, in which to either withdraw his petition or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Mr. Kiderlen's request to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is granted. For reasons explained in this Entry, Mr. Kiderlen shall have through June 15, 2011, in which to show cause why this action can proceed under § 2241 or why, in the alternative, it should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. Mr. Kiderlen's motion for release 5 and motion for appointment of counsel 4 are each denied for the present as premature in light of the need to determine whether the action will go forward in this District as one for habeas corpus relief. The clerk shall include a copy of the petition and attachments 1 with the petitioner's copy of this Entry. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/25/2011. Copy to Petitioner via U.S. mail.(NKD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KIDERLEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: STEVEN D. KIDERLEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?