GILBERT v. DOE et al
BRENT R. GILBERT |
JOHN DOE, CAPT. JOHN DOE and BRUCE LEMMON |
2:2011cv00159 |
June 14, 2011 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Terre Haute Office |
Mark J. Dinsmore |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ENTRY Discussing Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings; the allegations involving Superintendent Lemmon fail to support a plausible claim and any such claim is therefore dismissed. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time as to the cl aim(s) resolved in this Entry. Claims against the John Doe defendants are not similarly deficient. However, for the action to develop further requires that these defendants be identified. After the Superintendent has entered an appearance, the plai ntiff shall have 60 days in which to complete discovery regarding the identities of the John Doe defendants and to seek substitution of them. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3), to issue and serve process on the current Super intendent of the Putnamville Correctional Facility in the manner specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1). Process shall consist of the complaint, applicable forms and this Entry. (See Entry for details) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/9/2011. (copy to Plaintiff and Superintendent PCF via U.S. mail)(NKD). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 9/9/2011.(NKD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.