MOON et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
| DARNELL WESLEY MOON |
| R. RARDIN, HECTOR J. JOYNER, R. BASKERVILLE, HARVEY CHURCH, THERESA K. COZZA-RHODES, S. ECKERT, B. ENGLISH, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES LOCKETT, HELEN J MARBERRY and CHAPLAIN HOLSTON |
| 2:2011cv00178 |
| July 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ENTRY and Order Directing Dismissal of Action - this matter is dismissed with prejudice. Judgement consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Copy to plaintiiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/20/2012.(RSF) Modified on 3/20/2012 - added copy text (RSF).
|
|
Filing
39
ENTRY Dismissing Amended Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - The amended complaint 32 is dismissed based on the violation of Rule 8. The dismissal of the amended complaint will not in this instance result in the dismissal of the action. Benjamin v. United States, 833 F.2d 669, 671 (7th Cir. 1987). Instead, the plaintiff shall have through December 22, 2011, in which to file a second amended complaint. If a second amended complaint is filed, it shall conform to the following guidelin es (SEE ENTRY). If no second amended complaint is filed as permitted in Part II of this Entry, the action will be dismissed consistent with the dismissal of the amended complaint in Part I. If a second amended complaint is filed as permitted in Part II of this Entry, that pleading will be screened as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and an appropriate order will issue following the completion of that step. (copy to Plaintiff via US Mail). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/1/2011.(JKS)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER denying as moot 34 and 35 Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis as unnecessary because he was granted in forma pauperis status; granting 36 Motion for status of case and copies of pleadings; and granting 37 Motion to Dismiss Counts 4 and 5 of amended complaint. No partial final judgment shall issue at this time. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 11/28/2011. (SMD)
|
|
Filing
19
ENTRY Concerning Selected Matters; The plaintiff's renewed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 12 is granted. The plaintiff's motions to supplement the complaint [15 and 16] are denied. The plaintiff shall have through September 8, 2011, in which to file an amended complaint. (see Entry for details) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/30/2011. (copy to plaintiff via U.S. mail) (NKD)
|
|
Filing
13
ENTRY - The plaintiff's request that this action proceed as a class action 8 is denied. The portion of the referenced motion in which the plaintiff seeks the appointment of class counsel is also denied (see Entry for details). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/2/2011. (copy to plaintiff via U.S. mail)(NKD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
