SLOAN v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Southern District SLOAN v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY

SLOAN v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY

Petitioner:	ROGER SLOAN
Respondent:	WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY
Case Number:	2:2011cv00255
Filed:	September 28, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Terre Haute Office
Presiding Judge:	Denise K. LaRue
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 14, 2012	Filing 17 Entry and Order Dismissing Action - Petitioner has not exhausted his available state remedies in the Indiana state courts (by filing an action for post- conviction relief) and this action should therefore be dismissed without prejudice. Judgment co nsistent with this Entry shall now issue. The court further concludes that petitioner has failed to show that reasonable jurists would find it 'debatable whether [this court] was correct in its procedural ruling.' The court therefore denies a certificate of appealability. Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/14/2012.(RSF)
March 13, 2012	Filing 14 ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - Petitioner must use Indiana's post- conviction relief process if it is available to him. He shall have through April 4, 2012, in which to explain why the present action should not be dismissed without prejudice so that he can exhaust this available remedy under Indiana law through the filing of an action for post-conviction relief. Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/13/2012.(RSF)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 14, 2012

Filing 17 Entry and Order Dismissing Action - Petitioner has not exhausted his available state remedies in the Indiana state courts (by filing an action for post- conviction relief) and this action should therefore be dismissed without prejudice. Judgment co nsistent with this Entry shall now issue. The court further concludes that petitioner has failed to show that reasonable jurists would find it 'debatable whether [this court] was correct in its procedural ruling.' The court therefore denies a certificate of appealability. Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/14/2012.(RSF)

March 13, 2012

Filing 14 ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - Petitioner must use Indiana's post- conviction relief process if it is available to him. He shall have through April 4, 2012, in which to explain why the present action should not be dismissed without prejudice so that he can exhaust this available remedy under Indiana law through the filing of an action for post-conviction relief. Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/13/2012.(RSF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SLOAN v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACIILITY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: ROGER SLOAN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?